Birdwell et al v Cates et al

Filing 31

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/23/2011 ADOPTING 21 Findings and Recommendations in full. Dft Vallery, any ADA claim and any claims regarding the treatment of inmate Mayfield are DISMISSED from this action. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
-GGH (PC) Birdwell et al v Cates et al Doc. 31 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. M. CATES, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 30, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: ///// 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BILLY PAUL BIRDWELL, II, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-719 KJM GGH P ORDER Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 /bird0719.800 1. The findings and recommendations filed December 30, 2010, are adopted in full; and 2. Defendant Vallery, any ADA claim and any claims regarding the treatment of inmate Mayfield are dismissed from this action. DATED: March 23, 2011. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?