Wilson v. McDonald et al

Filing 4

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 4/8/2010 ORDERING that pltf's 2 application to proceed IFP is DISMISSED w/out prejudice; the clerk to send pltf a new ifp application; pltf to submit, w/in 30 days, a completed ifp application. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 prejudice; 1 vs. M. McDONALD, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 together with a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. Plaintiff has not, however, filed his application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on the form used by this district. Use of the form assists plaintiff to establish and the court to evaluate plaintiff's in forma pauperis status in light of 28 U.S.C. 1915 (b)(1) and (2). Accordingly, plaintiff's application will be dismissed and plaintiff will be provided the opportunity to submit the application on the appropriate form. Plaintiff is cautioned that he must also provide a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is dismissed without ORDER GERALD WILSON, Plaintiff, No. 2:10-cv-0721 JFM (PC) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner; and 3. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. DATED: April 8, 2010. /kly014.wils0721.3djfm 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?