Pao v. On Habeas Corpus

Filing 39

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Bommer on 10/18/11 ORDERING that petitioner's 38 Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED; petitioner's objections to 37 F&Rs are due by 11/09/11. (Benson, A.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

GE LOR PAO,

11

Petitioner,

12
13

vs.
G.D. LEWIS, Warden,

14
15

2: 10 - cv - 758 - MCE TJB

Respondent.

ORDER

________________________________/

16

Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The

17

undersigned issued findings and recommendations on September 9, 2011 recommending that the

18

amended habeas petition be denied. The parties were given twenty-one days, or until September

19

30, 2011, to file objections to the findings and recommendations. After the twenty-one days

20

expired, Petitioner filed a motion for an extension of time to file objections until November 9,

21

2011. While Petitioner’s request is untimely as it was filed after the requisite time to file

22

objections had already expired, based upon the representations made and only for this request, it

23

is determined that good cause has been shown, and the request is granted. Petitioner is advised,

24

however, that no further extensions of time will be granted, except for verified and extraordinary

25

good cause shown.

26

//
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

Petitioner’s request filed October 13, 2011 for an extension of time to file

3

objections to the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations is hereby

4

GRANTED; and

5
6
7

2.

Petitioner shall have until November 9, 2011 to file objections to the findings and
recommendations.

DATED: October 18, 2011

8
9
10
11
TIMOTHY J BOMMER
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2