Smith v. Sahota et al
Filing
71
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/20/12 ORDERING that 70 Motion to modify the scheduling order is GRANTED; Defendants shall prepare and serve their responses to plaintiffs discovery requests by October 22, 2012; The deadline for defendants to take plaintiffs deposition is October 22, 2012; Any motions necessary to compel discovery shall be filed by November 12, 2012. Pursuant to the May 8, 2012 Discovery and Scheduling Order 58 , the deadline for propounding discovery r equests has passed; All pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, shall be filed on or before February 18, 2013. Motions shall be briefed in accordance with paragraph 7 of this courts order filed July 28, 2010; The May 8, 2012 Discovery and Scheduling Order 58 is vacated insofar as it conflicts with this order. Otherwise it remains in effect.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GREGORY SMITH,
Case No. 2:10-cv-00762 KJM CKD P
12
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
REQUEST TO MODIFY THE
SCHEDULING ORDER
13
v.
14
15
PREETRANJAN SAHOTA, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
18
19
Defendants have filed a request to modify the scheduling order and for an extension
of time to respond to Plaintiff’s discovery requests. (Dkt. No. 70.)
20
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
21
1. Defendants’ August 16, 2012 motion to modify the scheduling order and for an
22
23
24
extension of time (Dkt. No. 70) is granted;
2. Defendants shall prepare and serve their responses to plaintiff’s discovery requests
by October 22, 2012;
25
3. The deadline for defendants to take plaintiff’s deposition is October 22, 2012;
26
4. Any motions necessary to compel discovery shall be filed by November 12, 2012.
27
Pursuant to the May 8, 2012 Discovery and Scheduling Order (Dkt. No. 58), the deadline for
28
propounding discovery requests has passed;
1
5. All pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, shall be filed on or
2
before February 18, 2013. Motions shall be briefed in accordance with paragraph 7 of this court’s
3
order filed July 28, 2010;
4
6. The May 8, 2012 Discovery and Scheduling Order (Dkt. No. 58) is vacated insofar
5
as it conflicts with this order. Otherwise it remains in effect.
6
Dated: August 20, 2012
7
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
234b0d4o
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?