Suggs v. Marshall

Filing 13

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/25/2010 ORDERING that w/in 30 days, ptnr to file his opposition to respondent's 7/13/10 motion to dismiss.(Yin, K)

(HC) Suggs v. Marshall

Doc. 13

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
DAD:sj sugg0765.146

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TYSON JOIEL SUGGS, Petitioner, vs. JIM MARSHALL, Warden, Respondent. / On July 13, 2010, respondent filed a motion to dismiss in this case, arguing that petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is time-barred and the court lacks jurisdiction over the action. Petitioner has not opposed the motion. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days of the date of this order, petitioner shall file his opposition to respondent's July 13, 2010 motion to dismiss. Failure to file an opposition may result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). DATED: August 25, 2010. ORDER No. CIV S-10-0765 JAM DAD P

Dockets.Justia.com