Smith v. California State Prison - Sacramento et al

Filing 46

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 08/02/11 ordering that within 21 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to defendants' motion to dismiss. Alternatively, if plaintiff no longer wishes to proceed with this case he may file a motion to voluntarily dismiss this action. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BERNARD L. SMITH, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. CIV S-10-0766 DAD P vs. CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON – SACRAMENTO, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 On June 21, 2011, defendants filed a motion to dismiss this action pursuant to 17 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and unenumerated Rule 12(b). Plaintiff has not 18 opposed the motion. 19 Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written 20 opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to 21 the granting of the motion . . . .” On April 20, 2011, plaintiff was advised of the requirements for 22 filing an opposition to the motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may be deemed a 23 waiver of opposition to the motion. 24 Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be 25 grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the 26 ///// 1 1 inherent power of the Court.” In the order filed April 20, 2011, plaintiff was advised that failure 2 to comply with the Local Rules may result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed. 3 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within twenty-one days 4 of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to defendants’ motion to 5 dismiss. Failure to file an opposition will be deemed as a statement of non-opposition and shall 6 result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant Federal Rule of Civil 7 Procedure 41(b). Alternatively, if plaintiff no longer wishes to proceed with this case, he may 8 file a motion to voluntarily dismiss this action. 9 DATED: August 2, 2011. 10 11 12 DAD:9 smit0766.46 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?