Cassells v. Liggett
Filing
121
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/18/2014 DISMISSING CASE with Prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(l)(A)(ii). CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672
Attorney General of California
DAMON G. MCCLAIN, State Bar No. 209508
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
KYLE A. LEWIS, State Bar No. 201041
Deputy Attorney General
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000
San Francisco, CA 94102-7004
Telephone: (415) 703-5500
Facsimile: (415) 703-5843
E-mail: Kyle.Lewis@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Defendants
Liggett and Mathews
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SACRAMENTO
11
12
13
KEITH M. CASSELLS,
14
v.
15
16
Case No. 2:10-CV-0775 MCE DAD P
STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY
Plaintiff, DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
(Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii))
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LIGGETT,
17
Defendant.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Plaintiff Keith M. Cassells and Defendant Correctional Officer Liggett have resolved this
case in its entirety. Therefore, the parties stipulate to a dismissal of this action with prejudice
under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
//
//
25
26
27
28
1
Stip. Voluntary Dismissal [Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] (C 10-0775 MCE DAD P)
1
Each party shall bear its own litigation costs and attorney’s fees.
2
It is so stipulated.
3
4
Dated:
/s/ Keith M. Cassells
2/4/14
Keith M. Cassells, CDCR No. B-83173
Plaintiff
5
6
7
Dated:
/s/ Kyle A. Lewis
2/5/14
Kyle A. Lewis
Deputy Attorney General
California Attorney General's Office
Attorney for Defendants Liggett and Mathews
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
In accordance with the parties' stipulation, this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 18, 2014
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Stip. Voluntary Dismissal [Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] (C 10-0775 MCE DAD P)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?