Cassells v. Liggett

Filing 121

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/18/2014 DISMISSING CASE with Prejudice, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(l)(A)(ii). CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672 Attorney General of California DAMON G. MCCLAIN, State Bar No. 209508 Supervising Deputy Attorney General KYLE A. LEWIS, State Bar No. 201041 Deputy Attorney General 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 Telephone: (415) 703-5500 Facsimile: (415) 703-5843 E-mail: Kyle.Lewis@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendants Liggett and Mathews 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO 11 12 13 KEITH M. CASSELLS, 14 v. 15 16 Case No. 2:10-CV-0775 MCE DAD P STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY Plaintiff, DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)) CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LIGGETT, 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Plaintiff Keith M. Cassells and Defendant Correctional Officer Liggett have resolved this case in its entirety. Therefore, the parties stipulate to a dismissal of this action with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). // // 25 26 27 28 1 Stip. Voluntary Dismissal [Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] (C 10-0775 MCE DAD P) 1 Each party shall bear its own litigation costs and attorney’s fees. 2 It is so stipulated. 3 4 Dated: /s/ Keith M. Cassells 2/4/14 Keith M. Cassells, CDCR No. B-83173 Plaintiff 5 6 7 Dated: /s/ Kyle A. Lewis 2/5/14 Kyle A. Lewis Deputy Attorney General California Attorney General's Office Attorney for Defendants Liggett and Mathews 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 In accordance with the parties' stipulation, this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 18, 2014 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Stip. Voluntary Dismissal [Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] (C 10-0775 MCE DAD P)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?