Singh v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al

Filing 51

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/15/11 ORDERING that the Findings and Recommendations filed 6/23/11, are ADOPTED, and plaintiff's application for entry of default judgment, filed 4/7/11, as amended on 5/19/11, is DENIED without prejudice. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SASHI L. SINGH, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 CIV. NO. S-10-0836 JAM GGH vs. NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE CORP., et al., 14 15 Defendants. __________________________________/ 16 ORDER On June 23, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 17 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the 18 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 19 Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 20 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 21 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 22 1983). 23 The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 24 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full. 25 //// 26 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendations filed June 2 23, 2011, are ADOPTED, and plaintiff’s application for entry of default judgment, filed April 7, 3 2011, as amended on May 19, 2011, is DENIED without prejudice. 4 DATED: August 15, 2011 5 6 /s/ John A. Mendez 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?