Mallett v. Hubbard et al
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 08/09/11 ordering that within 30 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the motion for summary judgment. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
WADE KENNETH MALLETT,
11
12
Plaintiff,
No. 2: 10-cv-0851 KJN P
vs.
13
SUSAN HUBBARD, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
17
18
ORDER
/
On July 6, 2011, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion.
Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written
19
opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to
20
the granting of the motion . . . .” On August 12, 2010, plaintiff was advised of the requirements
21
for filing an opposition to a motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may be deemed a
22
waiver of opposition to the motion.
23
Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be
24
grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the
25
inherent power of the Court.” In the order filed August 12, 2010, plaintiff was also advised that
26
failure to comply with the Local Rules may result in a recommendation that the action be
1
1
dismissed.
2
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days of the
3
date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the motion for summary judgment.
4
Failure to file an opposition will be deemed as a statement of non-opposition and shall result in a
5
recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
6
DATED: August 9, 2011
7
8
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
mall851.osc
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?