River City Bank v. Shirk, et al.,
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 11/12/13. IT IS ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff River City Bank, a California Corporation, recover from Defendants Craig Shirk and Linda Dollahan Shirk, jointly and severally, the principal sum of $5,486.37, together with interest at the rate of 6 percent per annum from and after July 1, 2013, to October 25, 2013, in the sum of $103.71, and attorneys fees in the amount of $442.50, for a total judgment of $6,032.58.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Stephen H. Johanson, State Bar No. 61624
JOHANSON & ASSOCIATES
2495 Natomas Park Drive, Suite 620
Sacramento, California 95833
Telephone (916) 567-1000
Facsimile (916) 649-1373
Attorneys for River City Bank
UNITED STATES BANKRTUPCY COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
RIVER CITY BANK, a California
corporation,
ORDER
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Case No. 2:10-CV-00853 MCE-KJN
Plaintiff,
Complaint filed: February 24, 2010
Trial: none set
vs.
CRAIG SHIRK, an individual; LINDA
DOLLAHAN SHIRK, an individual;
RICHARD FRIEDMAN, an individual; BOB
THOMAS, an individual; CAROL THOMAS,
an individual, and DOES 1 through 50,
inclusive,
Defendants.
Honorable Morrison C. England Jr.
Courtroom 7, 14th Floor
The Court having considered the Ex Parte Application of Plaintiff River City Bank, a
California corporation, to Reopen Case and for Entry of Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation, and
good cause appearing therefore:
IT IS ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff River City Bank, a
California corporation, recover from Defendants Craig Shirk and Linda Dollahan Shirk, jointly
and severally, the principal sum of $5,486.37, together with interest at the rate of 6 percent per
annum from and after July 1, 2013, to October 25, 2013, in the sum of $103.71, and attorneys
fees in the amount of $442.50, for a total judgment of $6,032.58.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 12, 2013
27
28
Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?