Carmona v. Grannis et al

Filing 40

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/5/14 ORDERING that within 21 days after the filing date of this order, defendant DAlessandro shall file an answer to the Second Amended Complaint.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LUIS CARMONA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:10-cv-0898 KJM KJN P v. ORDER D'ALESSANDRO, 15 Defendant. 16 On March 31, 2014, this court denied defendant’s motion to dismiss and directed this 17 18 action to proceed on plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 18), against sole defendant 19 D’Alessandro. (See ECF Nos. 38, 39.) Defendant D’Alessandro has not yet filed an answer to 20 the Second Amended Complaint.1 After an answer has been filed, the court will issue a 21 Discovery and Scheduling Order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within 21 days after the filing date of this 22 23 order, defendant D’Alessandro shall file an answer to the Second Amended Complaint. 24 Dated: June 5, 2014 25 26 27 28 /carm0898.ord.answr 1 The only responsive pleading filed by defendant D’Alessandro was his motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 27.) 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?