Carmona v. Grannis et al

Filing 40

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/5/14 ORDERING that within 21 days after the filing date of this order, defendant DAlessandro shall file an answer to the Second Amended Complaint.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LUIS CARMONA,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:10-cv-0898 KJM KJN P

v.

ORDER

D'ALESSANDRO,

15

Defendant.

16
On March 31, 2014, this court denied defendant’s motion to dismiss and directed this

17
18

action to proceed on plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 18), against sole defendant

19

D’Alessandro. (See ECF Nos. 38, 39.) Defendant D’Alessandro has not yet filed an answer to

20

the Second Amended Complaint.1 After an answer has been filed, the court will issue a

21

Discovery and Scheduling Order.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within 21 days after the filing date of this

22
23

order, defendant D’Alessandro shall file an answer to the Second Amended Complaint.

24

Dated: June 5, 2014

25
26
27
28

/carm0898.ord.answr

1

The only responsive pleading filed by defendant D’Alessandro was his motion to dismiss the
Second Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 27.)
1