Jacobs v. Reed, et al.,

Filing 14

ORDER on Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for a Status Conference and/or continued stay of proceedings signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/16/15. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that time is enlarged for defendants to file responsive pleadings or motions 30 days after the stay is lifted. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5

THE LAW OFFICES OF GARY W. GORSKI
Gary W. Gorski - SBN: 166526
Attorney at Law
1207 Front Street, Suite 22
Sacramento, CA 95814
916.965.6800
[e-mail]
www.lonewolflaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff

6
7
8

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

THOMAS JACOBS,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CITY OF SAN JOSE MAYOR CHUCK REED, in )
both his individual and official capacities; CITY )
OF SAN JOSE; COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA; )
CITY OF SAN JOSE POLICE CHIEF ROB
)
DAVIS, in both his individual and official
)
capacities; COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
)
SHERIFF LAURIE SMITH, in both her individual )
and official capacities; and STATE OF
)
CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL
)
EDMUND G. BROWN, in his official capacity, )
)
Defendants.
)
)

Case No. 2:10-cv-00913-TLN-EFB
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF=S EX PARTE
APPLICATION FOR A STATUS
CONFERENCE AND/OR CONTINUED STAY
OF PROCEEDINGS

Courtroom 2, 15th floor
Honorable Judge Troy L. Nunley

21
22
23
24

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, Plaintiff=s Ex Parte Application for a Status Conference and/or
Continued Stay of Proceedings is hereby granted as follows:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all proceedings are stayed in this matter pending en banc review

25

of the cases Peruta v. County of San Diego, 742 F. 3d 1144 (9th Circuit 2014)(9th Cir. Case No.

26

10-56971) and Richards v. Prieto, (9th Cir. Case No. 11-16255) and that the stay shall remain in

27
28

-1-

________________________________________________________
ORDER

1
2
3
4

effect pending further order of the Court.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that time is enlarged for defendants to file responsive
pleadings or motions 30 days after the stay is lifted.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file notices of appearances, and that

5

the filing of a notice of appearance shall not constitute a waiver of their right to bring a motion pursuant

6

to 28 U.S.C. ' 1404(a) to transfer the action for the convenience of the parties.

7

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are obligated to notify this Court of

8

decisions in Peruta v. County of San Diego, 742 F. 3d 1144 (9th Circuit 2014)(9th Cir. Case No.

9

10-56971) and Richards v. Prieto, (9th Cir. Case No. 11-16255) within five working days after each has

10
11

been filed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

12
13

Dated: March 16, 2015

14

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2-

________________________________________________________
ORDER