Brownlee v. Feilken
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 4/15/10, CASE TRANSFERRRED to SACRAMENTO Division. New Case Number 2:10-cv-00925 LKK KJM (HC). Old Case Number 1:09-cv-00668 AWI DLB (HC). (Hellings, J)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 TOM FEILKEN, 13 Respondent. 14 15 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus 16 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 17 The federal venue statute requires that a civil action, other than one based on diversity 18 jurisdiction, be brought only in "(1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all 19 defendants reside in the same state, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events 20 or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of the property that is the 21 subject of the action is situated, or (3) a judicial district in which any defendant may be found, if 22 there is no district in which the action may otherwise be brought." 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). 23 In a habeas matter, venue is proper in either the district of conviction or the district of 24 confinement. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). Where a petitioner attacks the execution of his sentence, the 25 proper forum in which to review such a claim is the district of confinement. See Dunn v. 26 27 proper forum to challenge the execution of a sentence is the district where the prisoner is 28 1 Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989) (stating, in a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 action, that "[t]he / v. TERRENCE BROWNLEE, Petitioner, ORDER OF TRANSFER 1:09-cv-00668-AWI-DLB (HC)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
confined."). In this case, Petitioner was sentenced in Fresno County Superior Court, which is located within the Eastern District of California. Petitioner is currently incarcerated at High Desert State Prison, in Lassen County, which lies within the Eastern District of California, Sacramento Division. In addition, the instant petition is premised on events relating to Petitioner's parole proceeding which took place at Folsom State Prison-also within the jurisdiction of the Eastern District of California, Sacramento Division. Accordingly, this matter should be addressed in the forum where petitioner is confined. Therefore, the petition should have been filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento Division. In the interest of justice, a federal court may transfer a case filed in the wrong district to the correct district. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a); Starnes v. McGuire, 512 F.2d 918, 932 (D.C. Cir. 1974). Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento Division. All future filings shall reference the new Sacramento case number assigned and shall be filed at: United States District Court Eastern District of California Sacramento Division 501 "I" Street, Suite 4-200 Sacramento, CA 95814 IT IS SO ORDERED.
19 Dated: 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 ah0l4d
April 15, 2010
/s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?