California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Vallejo Unified School District et al
Filing
14
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/7/10 ORDERING that the Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance's Complaint by 8/9/2010. The Pretrial Scheduling Conference is RE-SCHEDULED for 10/4/2010 at 09:00 AM. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Vallejo Unified School District et al
Doc. 14
Michael R. Lozeau (CA Bar No. 142893) michael@lozeaudrury.com Richard T. Drury (CA Bar No. 163559) richard@lozeaudrury.com David A. Zizmor (CA Bar No. 255863) david@lozeaudrury.com LOZEAU DRURY LLP 1516 Oak Street, Suite 216 Alameda, CA 94501 Tel: (510) 749-9102 Fax: (510) 749-9103 (fax) Attorneys for Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE, a non-profit corporation, Plaintiff, vs. VALLEJO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, a special district; RICHARD J. DAMELIO, in his official capacity; REYNALDO SANTA CRUZ, in his official capacity; CHRIS VILLANUEVA, in his official capacity; RAYMOND V. MOMMSEN, in his official capacity; HAZEL WILSON, in her official capacity; WARD STEWART, in his official capacity; DANIEL GLAZE, in his official capacity, and; THEODORE NEWTON, in his official capacity, Defendants. WHEREAS, Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance ("Plaintiff" or "CSPA") filed its Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and Civil Penalties ("Complaint") with the Court on April 19, 2010; WHEREAS, on April 19, 2010, the Court issued an Order Setting Status which set Case No. 2:10-cv-00943-GEB-GGH STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS' TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND SET A NEW DATE FOR THE STATUS CONFERENCE; [LOCAL RULES 143 AND 144] Judge: Hon. Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Conference: August 9, 2010 Time: 9:00 a.m. Courtroom: 10
Dockets.Justia.com
the Pretrial Scheduling Status Conference for August 9, 2010 at 9:00 am; WHEREAS, CSPA served the Complaint and Summons in this action on Defendants on June 1, 2010; WHEREAS, Defendants dispute that Plaintiff has properly affected service of the Complaint and Summons but have agreed not to contest service; WHEREAS, Defendants' answer or response to the Complaint was due on or before June 22, 2010; WHEREAS, Defendants have requested and CSPA has consented to extend the time for Defendants to answer or respond to the Complaint; WHEREAS, Defendants have requested and CSPA has consented to a new date for the status conference; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective counsel: 1. 2. 3. That Defendants shall not contest that the Complaint and Summons in this That Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to CSPA's Complaint by That the Pretrial Scheduling Status Conference shall be moved from August 9, action were properly served on all Defendants; August 9, 2010; and 2010 at 9:00 am to October 4, 2010 at 9:00 am.
Dated: July 6, 2010
Respectfully submitted, LOZEAU DRURY LLP By: __/s/ Michael R. Lozeau_________________ Michael R. Lozeau ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE
DANNIS WOLIVER KELLEY By: __/s/ Amy R. Levine (as authorized on 7/6/2010)
Amy R. Levine ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS VALLEJO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, RICHARD J. DAMELIO, REYNALDO SANTA CRUZ, CHRIS VILLANUEVA, RAYMOND V. MOMMSEN, HAZEL WILSON, WARD STEWART, DANIEL GLAZE, AND THEODORE NEWTON
ORDER Since the parties having stipulated and agreed, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance's Complaint by August 9, 2010. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Pretrial Scheduling Status Conference shall be re-scheduled for October 4, 2010 at 9:00 am. 7/7/10
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?