Armentero v. Doe

Filing 105

ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/12/13: The court DECLINES to modify its 102 Order. (Meuleman, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT COURT OF CALIFORNIA

10

LUIS L. ARMENTERO,

11
12
13
14
15
16

Plaintiff,

No. 2:10-cv-0965-KJM-KJN

Defendant.

ORDER

vs.
K.L. DICKINSON,

________________________________/
On February 13, 2013, a United States Magistrate Judge issued findings and

17

recommendations recommending that this court grant defendants’ motion for summary

18

judgment on plaintiff’s claims filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF 95.) Plaintiff timely filed

19

objections to the findings and recommendations on March 18, 2013, prior to the March 21

20

deadline. (ECF 97, 102.) On April 1, 2013, this court adopted the Magistrate Judge’s findings

21

and recommendations in full, addressing the substance of plaintiff’s objections in its order.

22

(ECF 102.) Also on April 1, plaintiff filed a second document entitled “Objections to Findings

23

and Recommendations.” (ECF 104.) These objections were not timely filed and do not include

24

arguments that are materially different from those in plaintiffs’ first objections that the court

25

has already reviewed. Accordingly, the court declines to modify its April 1, 2013 order.

26
27

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: April 12, 2013.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

28
1