Monday v. Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc. et al
Filing
140
ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 1/17/2012 DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforde the terms of the confidential settlement agreement. CASE CLOSED. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
7
8
9
HENRIETTA J. MONDAY, an
Individual,
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
v.
SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC.,
a Texas Corporation; OCWEN LOAN
SERVICING, LLC, a Delaware Limited
Liability Company; U.S. BANK, N.A., AS
TRUSTEE FOR THE REGISTERED
HOLDERS OF ABFC 2007-WMC1
TRUST ASSET BACKED FUNDING
CORPORATION ASSET BACKED
CERTIFICATED, SERIES 2007-WMC1,
an Ohio Business Entity; T.D. SERVICE
COMPANY, a California Corporation;
and DOES 1 through 10, Inclusive,
Defendants.
____________________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action: 2:10-CV-00989-WBS-CKD
Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb
Courtroom: 5 (14th Floor)
Action Filed: March 19, 2010
Trial Date: November 15, 2011
ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL OF
ENTIRE ACTION
22
TO ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD
23
Having considered the request for dismissal with prejudice except for jurisdiction to enforce the
24
confidential settlement agreement, should such enforcement be necessary, the Court orders the
25
following:
26
1.
The entire case is dismissed with prejudice except for jurisdiction to enforce the
27
confidential settlement agreement. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms
28
///
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION
(Monday v. Saxon, et al.)
1
2
of the confidential settlement agreement.
IT IS SO ORDERED
3
4
Dated: January 17, 2012
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION
(Monday v. Saxon, et al.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?