Monday v. Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc. et al

Filing 140

ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 1/17/2012 DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforde the terms of the confidential settlement agreement. CASE CLOSED. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION 7 8 9 HENRIETTA J. MONDAY, an Individual, 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 v. SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC., a Texas Corporation; OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; U.S. BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR THE REGISTERED HOLDERS OF ABFC 2007-WMC1 TRUST ASSET BACKED FUNDING CORPORATION ASSET BACKED CERTIFICATED, SERIES 2007-WMC1, an Ohio Business Entity; T.D. SERVICE COMPANY, a California Corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, Inclusive, Defendants. ____________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action: 2:10-CV-00989-WBS-CKD Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb Courtroom: 5 (14th Floor) Action Filed: March 19, 2010 Trial Date: November 15, 2011 ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION 22 TO ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD 23 Having considered the request for dismissal with prejudice except for jurisdiction to enforce the 24 confidential settlement agreement, should such enforcement be necessary, the Court orders the 25 following: 26 1. The entire case is dismissed with prejudice except for jurisdiction to enforce the 27 confidential settlement agreement. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms 28 /// [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION (Monday v. Saxon, et al.) 1 2 of the confidential settlement agreement. IT IS SO ORDERED 3 4 Dated: January 17, 2012 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION (Monday v. Saxon, et al.)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?