Gangstee et al v. County of Sacramento et al

Filing 67

ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/20/12 re 66 Transcript ORDERING the court certifies that the appeal is not frivolous and presents a substantial question and so finds that the costs of the transcript preparation should be borne by the United States. (cc: COA, court reporter). (Meuleman, A)

1
2
3
4
5

LAW OFFICE OF STEWART KATZ
Stewart Katz, SBN 127425
Guy Danilowitz, SBN 257733
555 University Avenue, Suite 270
Sacramento, CA 95825
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff

6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
10
11

DEANNA GANGSTEE,

NO. 2:10-CV-01004-KJM-GGH

Plaintiff,

12
vs.

13
14

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,

15

PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST AND ORDER TO
PREPARE TRANSCRIPT

Defendants.
__________________________________/

16
17

Plaintiff Deanna Gangstee hereby moves the court for court reporter Cathie Bodene to

18

prepare the transcript of the hearing on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment

19

before Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on October 5, 2011 (ECF Document Number 48 (Text

20

Only)). Plaintiff’s motion is based on the grounds that the court granted Plaintiff’s motion to

21

proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (ECF Document Number 64) and that Plaintiff needs the

22

transcript for the appeal.

23

Dated: March 12, 2012

24
25

//

26
27
28

//
//

/s/ Stewart Katz
STEWART KATZ,
Attorney for Plaintiff

1

The court certifies that the appeal is not frivolous and presents a substantial

2
question and so finds that the costs of the transcript preparation should be borne by the
3
4

United States. 18 U.S.C. § 753(f).

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6

Dated: March 20, 2012.

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE