Sousa v. Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc. et al

Filing 10

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 7/14/2010 ORDERING that the hearing date of 7/15/2010 is VACATED. Hearing on 4 Motion to Dismiss is CONTINUED to 8/19/2010 at 11:00 AM in 8th floor courtroom (JFM) before Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds. Pltf shall file opposition, to the motion to dismiss, no later than 8/5/2010. (Zignago, K.)

(PS) Sousa v. Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc. et al

Doc. 10

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC., Defendant. / This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On April 30, 2010 defendants filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). No opposition to the motion to dismiss has been filed. Local Rule 230(c) provides that opposition to the granting of a motion must be filed fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Rule further provides that "[n]o party will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if written opposition to the motion has not been timely filed by that party." In addition, Local Rule 230(i) provides that failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of opposition to the motion or may result in sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules "may be ///// 1
Dockets.Justia.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LUIS S. SOUSA, Plaintiff, No. CIV 2:10-cv-1018-MCE-JFM

ORDER

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court." Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The hearing date of July 15, 2010 is vacated. Hearing on defendants' motion to dismiss is continued to August 19, 2010. 2. Plaintiff shall file opposition, if any, to the motion to dismiss, no later than August 5, 2010. Failure to file opposition and appear at the hearing will be deemed as a statement of non-opposition and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). DATED: July 14, 2010.

/014;sous1018.nooppo.osc

2