Davis v. Haviland
Filing
36
ORDER ADOPTING 35 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/8/13. The 32 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED; respondent shall file and serve an answer to the petition within 30 days; traverse due 30 days thereafter. (Manzer, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DONALD DAVIS,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:10-cv-01029 KJM DAD P
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
JAMES HAVILAND,
Respondents.
16
17
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an amended application for a writ
18
of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
19
Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On June 20, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were
21
served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings
22
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to
23
the findings and recommendations.
24
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602
25
F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.
26
See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having carefully
27
reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record
28
and by the proper analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed June 20, 2013, are adopted in full;
3
2. Respondent's January 23, 2013 motion to dismiss (ECF No. 32) is denied; and
4
3. Respondent shall file and serve an answer within thirty days from the service of this
5
order; petitioner shall file and serve his traverse thirty days thereafter.
6
DATED: August 8, 2013.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?