Harris v. High Desert State Prison et al

Filing 42

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/26/11 ORDERING that, within 30 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file either an opposition to the motion to dismiss or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEE EDWARD HARRIS, Plaintiff, 11 12 No. CIV S-10-1031 JAM EFB P vs. 13 HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 ORDER / Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 17 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 15, 2011, defendant Sisson filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to 18 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. 19 A responding party’s failure “to file written opposition or to file a statement of no 20 opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion and may 21 result in the imposition of sanctions.” L. R. 230(l). Failure to comply with any order or with the 22 Local Rules “may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or 23 Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.” L. R. 110. The court may recommend this 24 action be dismissed with or without prejudice, as appropriate, if plaintiff disobeys an order or the 25 Local Rules. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1252 (9th Cir. 1992) (district court did not 26 abuse discretion in dismissing pro se plaintiff’s complaint for failing to obey an order to re-file 1 1 an amended complaint to comply with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure); Carey v. King, 856 2 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988) (dismissal for pro se plaintiff’s failure to comply with local 3 rule regarding notice of change of address affirmed). 4 On January 4, 2011, the court advised plaintiff of the requirements for filing an 5 opposition to the motion, that failure to oppose such a motion may be deemed a waiver of 6 opposition to the motion, and that failure to comply with the Local Rules may result in a 7 recommendation of dismissal. 8 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that, within 30 days of the date of this order, 9 plaintiff shall file either an opposition to the motion to dismiss or a statement of non-opposition. 10 Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed 11 without prejudice. 12 DATED: May 26, 2011. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?