Airy v. Schwarzenegger et al
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/20/10 ordering this action is dismissed with prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)
(PC) Airy v. Schwarzenegger et al
Doc. 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
GGH:035
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHARLES D. AIRY, Plaintiff, vs. SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants. / On May 12, 2010, plaintiff filed his consent to the jurisdiction of the undersigned (Docket #4). By order filed June 4, 2010, the court granted plaintiff twenty-eight days to file an amended complaint. In the June 4th order, the court informed plaintiff of the deficiencies in his complaint. On July 16, 2010, plaintiff was granted a thirty day extension of time to file his amended complaint. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order. For the reasons given in the June 4, 2010, order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). DATED: October 20, 2010 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
airy1035.fta
No. CIV S-10-1035 GGH P
ORDER
26
1
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?