Matson v. Allison

Filing 15

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/11/10 ORDERING that petitioner show cause, within 21 days, why his failure to oppose respondents July 7, 2010 motion to dismiss should not deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion.(Dillon, M)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. KATHLEEN ALLISON, Respondent. / Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On July 7, 2010, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. Petitioner has not filed an opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: "Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . ." Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner show cause, within twenty-one days, why his failure to oppose respondent's July 7, 2010 motion to dismiss should not deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion. Petitioner is //// //// //// 1 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE JAY MATSON, Petitioner, No. 2: 10-cv-1047 JAM KJN P IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

cautioned that failure to respond to the instant order, or to file an opposition to the pending motion to dismiss, will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. DATED: August 11, 2010

_____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
mat1047.46

2