Matson v. Allison

Filing 17

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 09/14/10 ORDERING the 08/12/10 Order to Show Cause discharged; Petitioner's opposition attache to his 09/03/10 pleading is deemed timely; respondent may file a reply within 14 days; following that respondent's motion to dismiss will be submitted for decision. (Williams, D)

Download PDF
(HC)Matson v. Allison Doc. 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. KATHLEEN ALLISON, Respondent. / On July 7, 2010, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. Petitioner failed to file an opposition. Accordingly, on August 12, 2010, petitioner was ordered to show cause why his failure to oppose respondent's motion should not be deemed a waiver of opposition. On September 3, 2010, petitioner filed a response to the order to show cause. Petitioner states that he mailed his opposition on August 5, 2010. Attached to petitioner's September 3, 2010 pleading is a copy of his opposition although the proof of service does not state the date on which it was mailed. Good cause appearing, petitioner's opposition is deemed timely filed and the order to show cause is discharged. //// //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JAY MATSON, Petitioner, No. 2: 10-cv-1047 JAM KJN P ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 mat1047.ord Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The August 12, 2010 order to show cause is discharged; 2. Petitioner's opposition, attached to his September 3, 2010 pleading, is deemed timely filed; respondent may file a reply within fourteen days of this order; following that time, respondent's motion to dismiss will be submitted for decision. DATED: September 14, 2010 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?