Kozak et al v. Chabad-Lubavitch Inc. et al
Filing
63
STIPULATION and ORDER re: 61 signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/14/13 VACATING Settlement Conference scheduled for 11/18/13. The parties shall SUBMIT a joint request for a new Settlement Conference date following the completion of discovery. (Meuleman, A)
1
2
3
4
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
GLEN F. DORGAN
Assistant United States Attorneys
2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401
Fresno, California 93721
(559) 497-4080 (telephone)
(559) 497-4099 (facsimile)
5
6
Attorneys for the United States
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel.
ARIA KOZAK and DONNA KOZAK,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
17
18
CASE NO. 2:10-cv-01056-MCE-EFB
STIPULATION TO VACATE
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
v.
CHABAD-LUBAVITCH INC.; CHABAD OF
CALIFORNIA; CHABAD RUNNING
SPRINGS RESIDENTIAL CAMP; CHABAD
CHEDER MENACHEM; YESHIVA OHR
ELCHONON CHABAD; BAIS CHANA HIGH
SCHOOL; CHABAD OF THE MARINA; and
BAIS CHAYA MUSHKA,
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
STIPULATION RECITALS
23
24
1.
On September 3, 2013, the Court issued a Pretrial Scheduling Order that directed the
25
parties to participate in a Settlement Conference on October 15, 2013, before the Honorable Carolyn K.
26
Delaney.
27
2.
28
By Order dated October 10, 2013, and pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the Court
continued the Settlement Conference to November 18, 2013.
29
Stipulation; Order
30
1
1
3.
The United States has served written discovery on Defendant Chabad of California and
2
scheduled depositions of defense witnesses to be completed during the week of November 11, 2013.
3
Defendant Chabad of California did not respond to the written discovery, and the United States filed a
4
motion to compel. On November 5, 2013, the Court granted the United States’ motion to compel the
5
written discovery as well as initial disclosures. Additionally, at the request of counsel for Defendant
6
Chabad of California, depositions set for the week of November 11, 2013, are being continued.
7
8
9
10
4.
To ensure that the necessary discovery is produced and depositions are completed before
the Settlement Conference, the parties have agreed to continue the Settlement Conference.
5.
Upon completion of discovery, the parties have agreed to notify the Court and request a
date for the Settlement Conference.
STIPULATION
11
12
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, acting by and through their counsel of
13
record, that the Settlement Conference currently set for November 18, 2013, be vacated and rescheduled
14
upon joint request by the parties to the Court following the completion of discovery.
Respectfully submitted,
15
16
Dated: November 12, 2013
17
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
By: /s/
18
19
20
Dated: November 12, 2013
Glen F. Dorgan
Glen F. Dorgan
Assistant U.S. Attorney
HIRST LAW GROUP, PC
21
By: /s/
22
23
24
Dated: November 12, 2013
Michael A. Hirst
Michael A. Hirst
Attorneys for the Relators
LAW OFFICE OF JEFFREY G. JACOBS
25
By: /s/
26
27
28
29
Stipulation; Order
30
2
Jeffrey G. Jacobs
Jeffrey G. Jacobs
Attorneys for the Defendant Chabad of
California
1
2
3
Dated: November 12, 2013
DONALD L. SALTZMAN, PLC
4
By: /s/
5
6
Donald L. Saltzman
Donald L. Saltzman
Attorneys for Defendant Yeshiva Ohr
Elchonon Chabad
7
8
Dated: November 12, 2013
LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW J. STERN
9
By: /s/
10
11
Andrew J. Stern
Andrew J. Stern
Attorneys for Defendants Chabad of the
Marina and Bais Chaya Mushka
12
ORDER
13
14
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Settlement Conference scheduled for November 18, 2013, is
15
vacated. The parties shall submit a joint request for a new Settlement Conference date following the
16
completion of discovery.
17
Dated: November 14, 2013
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
Stipulation; Order
30
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?