Kozak et al v. Chabad-Lubavitch Inc. et al

Filing 77

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/24/14 GRANTING 75 Request to Either Authorize Multiple Briefs in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of Extend the Page Limitation for the Brief in Support of Summary Judgment. IT IS ORDERED that the page limitation for the United States' memorandum of points and authorities, to be filed 6/26/14, in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment, shall be 30 pages. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney GLEN F. DORGAN Assistant United States Attorneys 2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401 Fresno, California 93721 (559) 497-4080 (telephone) (559) 497-4099 (facsimile) Attorneys for the Plaintiff UNITED STATES 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. ARIA KOZAK and DONNA KOZAK, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 18 v. CHABAD-LUBAVITCH INC.; CHABAD OF CALIFORNIA; CHABAD RUNNING SPRINGS RESIDENTIAL CAMP; CHABAD CHEDER MENACHEM; YESHIVA OHR ELCHONON CHABAD; BAIS CHANA HIGH SCHOOL; CHABAD OF MARINA; and BAIS CHAYA MUSHKA, CASE NO. 2:10-cv-01056-MCE-EFB ORDER ON UNITED STATES’ REQUEST TO EITHER (1) AUTHORIZE MULTIPLE BRIEFS; OR (2) EXTEND THE PAGE LIMITATION FOR THE UNITED STATES’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendants. 19 20 21 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 29 1 1 Upon consideration of the United States’ Request to Either (1) Authorize Multiple Briefs in 2 Support of the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment; or (2) Extend the Page Limitation for the 3 United States’ Brief in Support of Summary Judgment, and good cause appearing therefor, 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the page limitation for the United States’ memorandum of points 5 and authorities, to be filed June 26, 2014, in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment, shall be thirty 6 (30) pages. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 24, 2014 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?