Vaca v. Cate

Filing 12

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/18/10 ORDERING that petitioner shall show cause in writing, within 21 days, why his failure to oppose respondents June 30, 2010 motion to dismiss should not be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion, and shall file such opposition.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
(HC) Vaca v. Cate Doc. 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. MATTHEW CATE, Respondent. / Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On June 30, 2010, respondent filed a motion to dismiss this action based on the statute of limitations. Petitioner has not filed an opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: "Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . ." Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner shall show cause in writing, within twenty-one days, why his failure to oppose respondent's June 30, 2010 motion to dismiss should not be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion, and shall file such opposition. Petitioner is cautioned that failure to respond to the instant order, or to file an opposition to the pending motion to dismiss, will result in a recommendation that 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SALVADOR MENDEZ VACA, Petitioner, No. 2:10-cv-1077 MCE KJN P ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 this action be dismissed. SO ORDERED. DATED: October 18, 2010 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE vaca1077.osc.no.opp. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?