Cash v. Swingle et al

Filing 15

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/19/10 ORDERING that plaintiffs right of access and due process claims against defendant Walker are dismissed without prejudice.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
(PC) Cash v. Swingle et al Doc. 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. DOROTHY A. SWINGLE, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff is a prisoner without counsel suing for alleged civil rights violations. See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and is before the undersigned pursuant to plaintiff's consent. See E.D. Cal. Local Rules, Appx. A, at (k)(4). By order filed August 26, 2010, the court found that plaintiff had stated a cognizable Eighth Amendment claim against defendants Miranda, Nepomuceno, Swingle, and Walker, and informed plaintiff he could proceed against those defendants on an Eighth Amendment claim only or file an amended complaint to attempt to state additional cognizable claims against defendant Walker for violation of plaintiff's right of access to courts and due process. The court also informed plaintiff that it would consider plaintiff's decision to proceed only as to the Eighth Amendment claim against defendants Miranda, Nepomuceno, Swingle, and Walker as consent to 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RANDALL SCOTT CASH, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-1082 EFB P ORDER Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 the dismissal of his due process and right of access claims claim against defendant Walker. On September 15, 2010, plaintiff returned documents for service against defendants Miranda, Nepomuceno, Swingle, and Walker, electing not to file an amended complaint to attempt to state cognizable right of access and due process claims against defendant Walker. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's right of access and due process claims against defendant Walker are dismissed without prejudice. Dated: October 19, 2010. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?