Cash v. Swingle et al

Filing 23

ORDER granting 21 Motion to take plaintiff's deposition by videoconference signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/28/11. (Kaminski, H)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. DOROTHY A. SWINGLE, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 1, 2011, defendants submitted a motion to conduct plaintiff's deposition via videoconference, in order to avoid travel expenditures that would be incurred if defense counsel were required to travel to plaintiff's place of incarceration. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(4) (providing that, on motion, the court may order that a deposition be taken by remote means). Plaintiff has filed no opposition to the request. Good cause appearing, it is ORDERED that defendant's request to take plaintiff's deposition by videoconference is granted. DATED: February 28, 2011. ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RANDALL SCOTT CASH, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-1082 EFB P