O'Campo v. Chico Mall, LP et al
Filing
70
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/13/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
LYNN HUBBARD III, SBN 69773
SCOTTLYNN J HUBBARD IV, SBN 212970
DISABLED ADVOCACY GROUP, APLC
12 Williamsburg Lane
Chico, CA 95926
Telephone: (530) 895-3252
Facsimile: (530) 894-8244
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DIMAS O’CAMPO
MARTIN H. ORLICK, SBN 083908
JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MITCHELL LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, Fifth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3824
Telephone: (415) 398-8080
Facsimile: (415) 398-5584
Attorneys for Defendant
HOT TOPIC, INC.
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
DIMAS O’CAMPO,
17
Case No. 2:10-CV-01105-LKK-CMK
Plaintiff,
JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
and ORDER THEREON
18
v.
19
CHICO MALL, LP, et al.,
20
Defendants.
/
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint Stipulation for Dismissal
-1-
O’Campo v. Chico Mall, LP, et al.
Case No. 2:10-CV-01105-LKK-CMK
1
TO THE COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES:
2
Plaintiff, DIMAS O’CAMPO, and defendant, HOT TOPIC, INC. dba HOT TOPIC
3
#423, stipulate to and jointly request that this Court enter a dismissal with prejudice of
4
plaintiff’s complaint in the above-entitled action in its entirety pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
5
41(a)(2).
6
7
Dated: April 12, 2011
DISABLED ADVOCACY GROUP, APLC
8
/s/ Lynn Hubbard III
LYNN HUBBARD III
Attorney for Plaintiff DIMAS O’CAMPO
9
10
11
12
Dated: April 12, 2011
13
JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MITCHELL LLP
/s/ Martin H. Orlick
MARTIN H. ORLICK
Attorney for Defendant HOT TOPIC, INC.
14
15
16
17
18
19
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint of plaintiff, USDC Case No. 2:10-CV01105-LKK-CMK, is hereby dismissed with prejudice.
20
21
Dated: April 13, 2011.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint Stipulation for Dismissal
-2-
O’Campo v. Chico Mall, LP, et al.
Case No. 2:10-CV-01105-LKK-CMK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?