O'Campo v. Chico Mall, LP et al

Filing 70

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/13/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 LYNN HUBBARD III, SBN 69773 SCOTTLYNN J HUBBARD IV, SBN 212970 DISABLED ADVOCACY GROUP, APLC 12 Williamsburg Lane Chico, CA 95926 Telephone: (530) 895-3252 Facsimile: (530) 894-8244 Attorneys for Plaintiff DIMAS O’CAMPO MARTIN H. ORLICK, SBN 083908 JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MITCHELL LLP Two Embarcadero Center, Fifth Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3824 Telephone: (415) 398-8080 Facsimile: (415) 398-5584 Attorneys for Defendant HOT TOPIC, INC. 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 DIMAS O’CAMPO, 17 Case No. 2:10-CV-01105-LKK-CMK Plaintiff, JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL and ORDER THEREON 18 v. 19 CHICO MALL, LP, et al., 20 Defendants. / 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Joint Stipulation for Dismissal -1- O’Campo v. Chico Mall, LP, et al. Case No. 2:10-CV-01105-LKK-CMK 1 TO THE COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES: 2 Plaintiff, DIMAS O’CAMPO, and defendant, HOT TOPIC, INC. dba HOT TOPIC 3 #423, stipulate to and jointly request that this Court enter a dismissal with prejudice of 4 plaintiff’s complaint in the above-entitled action in its entirety pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 41(a)(2). 6 7 Dated: April 12, 2011 DISABLED ADVOCACY GROUP, APLC 8 /s/ Lynn Hubbard III LYNN HUBBARD III Attorney for Plaintiff DIMAS O’CAMPO 9 10 11 12 Dated: April 12, 2011 13 JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MITCHELL LLP /s/ Martin H. Orlick MARTIN H. ORLICK Attorney for Defendant HOT TOPIC, INC. 14 15 16 17 18 19 ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint of plaintiff, USDC Case No. 2:10-CV01105-LKK-CMK, is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 20 21 Dated: April 13, 2011. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Joint Stipulation for Dismissal -2- O’Campo v. Chico Mall, LP, et al. Case No. 2:10-CV-01105-LKK-CMK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?