Hixson v City of Lodi, et al

Filing 21

STIPULATION and ORDER 18 for extension of time signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 2/28/2011. Matter is REFERRED to VDRP pursuant to parties' Request, as set forth in their 19 Joint Status Report. Their request that VDRP process be completed w/in 90 days, service must be effectuated w/in 120 days following date this Order is electronically filed unless good cause is demonstrated for a further extension for timely service and approved by the Court. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
Hixson v City of Lodi, et al Doc. 21 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 LOUIS A. LEONE, ESQ. (SBN: 099874) CLAUDIA LEED, ESQ. (SBN: 122676) STUBBS & LEONE A Professional Corporation 2175 N. California Blvd., Suite 900 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Telephone: (925) 974-8600 Facsimile: (925) 974-8601 E-Mail: lleone@stubbsleone.com E-Mail: leedc@stubbsleone.com Attorneys for Defendants The CITY OF LODI and the LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, CATHY NICHOLS-WASHER, ART HAND and ERIK SANDSTROM RUSSELL S. HUMPHREY, ESQ. (SBN: 208744) ERIK A. GUTIERREZ, ESQ. (SBN: 273837) 404 W. Pine Street, Suite 14 Lodi, CA 95240 Telephone: (209) 369-2751 Facsimile: (209) 369-3687 E-Mail: rshumprey@yahoo.com E-Mail: eagutierrezlaw@gmail.com Attorney for Plaintiff JEREMY HIXSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JEREMY HIXON, Plaintiff, Case No.: 2:10-CV-01128-MCE-GGH STIPULATION RE: DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE AND SERVE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER 22 vs. 23 24 25 26 27 28 CITY OF LODI; LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT; AND DOES 1 through 20, Defendants. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2:10-CV-01128-MCE-GGH STIPULATION RE DEADLINE TO FILE AND SERVE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 The parties to the above captioned matter hereby stipulate by and through their undersigned counsel of record to extend the deadline for the defendants to file and serve a responsive pleading to the Second Amended Complaint to 30 days after the 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 completion of mediation or settlement conference. The parties further stipulate that service of the summons and complaint on the individually named defendants will be suspended until 30 days following the settlement conference. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: February 18, 2011 STUBBS & LEONE ________/s/___________________________ LOUIS A. LEONE, ESQ. CLAUDIA LEED, ESQ. Attorney for Defendants THE CITY OF LODI and the LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, CATHY NICHOLS-WASHER, ART HAND and ERIK SANDSTROM MARSHALL & MARSHALL _________/s/________________________ RUSSELL HUMPREHY, ESQ. Attorney for Plaintiff Jeremy Hixson ORDER Given this stipulation, and the parties' request, as set forth in their Joint Status Report filed on February 22, 2011, that the matter be referred forthwith to early VDRP, 26 27 28 as well as their request that the VDRP process be completed within ninety (90) days, service must be effectuated within one hundred twenty (120) days following the date _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2:10-CV-01128-MCE-GGH STIPULATION RE DEADLINE TO FILE AND SERVE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 2 1 2 3 this Order is electronically filed unless good cause is demonstrated for a further extension for timely service and approved by the Court.. IT IS SO ORDERED: 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATE: February 28, 2011 ______________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE . _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2:10-CV-01128-MCE-GGH STIPULATION RE DEADLINE TO FILE AND SERVE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?