Tracy v. City of Redding et al

Filing 18

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 12/01/10 ORDERING that plf shall show cause, in writing, w/i 30 days, why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. (Benson, A.)

(PS) Tracy v. City of Redding et al

Doc. 18

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 By separate order the court sets forth a schedule for the prosecution of this case in the event it is not dismissed. 1
Dockets.Justia.com
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MEGAN VOGEL TRACY, Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF REDDING, et al., Defendants. /

No. CIV S-10-1130-FCD-CMK

ORDER

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Originally filed in the Shasta County Superior Court, defendants removed the case to this court on May 6, 2010. A scheduling conference was held on November 18, 2010, at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned in Redding, California. Gary Brickwood, Esq., appeared for defendants. Plaintiff failed to appear or file a scheduling conference statement.1 In light of plaintiff's failure to appear at the scheduling conference and her apparent failure to prosecute this case, plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

See Local Rule 110. Failure to respond to this order may result in dismissal of the action for the reasons outlined above. See id. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, within 30 days of the date of this order, why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders.

DATED: December 1, 2010 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2