Herrera v. Statti

Filing 34

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/5/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 6/15/11 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel 32 is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

ROBERTO HERRERA,

11

Plaintiff,

12

vs.

13

No. CIV S-10-1154 MCE DAD P

P. STATTI, et al.,
Defendants.

14

ORDER
/

15
16

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil

17

rights action. On June 15, 2011, plaintiff filed his fifth motion for the appointment of counsel.

18

Plaintiff has filed similar motions on May 6, 2010, June 1, 2010, January 10, 2011, and February

19

28, 2011. The court denied all of plaintiff’s previous motions for the appointment of counsel.
In light of the court’s previous orders, and for the reasons discussed therein, IT IS

20
21

HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s June 15, 2011 motion for appointment of counsel (Doc.

22

No. 32) is denied.

23

DATED: July 5, 2011.

24
25
26

DAD:9:md
herr1154.31.thr