James v. Mehta

Filing 115

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 04/29/13 withdrawing 104 Motion for Discovery. The parties shall disclose any expert witnesses on or before 06/30/13. The parties shall complete all expert and non-expert discovery and file all non-dispositive motions on or before 08/30/13. The parties shall file any dispositive motions on or before 10/30/13. Except as otherwise stated in this order, the court's 02/15/13 scheduling order remains in effect. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES CORNELIUS JAMES, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 vs. DEEPAK MEHTA, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 17 No. 2:10-cv-1171 LKK DAD P Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel. The parties have filed a stipulation requesting that the court modify the scheduling order in this action. 18 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 19 1. Plaintiff’s motion to extend discovery (Doc. No. 104) is deemed withdrawn; 20 2. The parties shall disclose any expert witnesses on or before June 30, 2013; 21 3. The parties shall complete all expert and non-expert discovery and file all non- 22 dispositive motions on or before August 30, 2013; 23 4. The parties shall file any dispositive motions on or before October 30, 2013; 24 and 25 ///// 26 ///// 1 1 5. Except as otherwise stated in this order, the court’s February 15, 2013 2 scheduling order remains in effect. 3 DATED: April 29, 2013. 4 5 6 DAD:9 jame1171.41mod(2) 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?