James v. Mehta

Filing 160

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/7/2013 ORDERING that the summary judgment briefing schedule is modified as follows: Plaintiff's Oppositions to Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment shall be filed and served no later than Friday, 1/24/2014. The Defendants' Replies to Plaintiff's Oppositions to Motions for Summary Judgment shall be filed and served no later than Friday, 2/14/2014. The hearing now set for 12/6/2013, is CONTINUED to Friday, 2/28/2014, at 10:00 a.m. 145 , 146 , 147 , 148 , 152 , 153 , 154 , 155 . (Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11

CHARLES C. JAMES,
Plaintiff,

12
13
14

vs.
DEEPAK MEHTA, et al.,
Defendants.

15
16
17

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 2:10-cv-01171-LKK-DAD-P
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
MODIFY FILING DEADLINES AND
HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANTS’
MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

18
19
20
21

Pursuant to Local Rule 143 and 144, the parties stipulate, and ask the Court to order, that
the deadline for the Plaintiff’s Oppositions to Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment be
extended to Friday, January 24, 2014, that deadlines for the Defendants’ Replies to Plaintiff’s
Oppositions be extended to Friday, February 14, 2014, and that the hearing for the motions be

22

rescheduled for Friday, February 28, 2014. Good cause exists for this modification of the
23

schedule:
24

1. All defendants recently filed motions for summary judgment. (ECF Nos. 145 (Pai),
25
26
27
28

146 (G. Williams, MD), 147 (Dhillon), 148 (Capitano and Uppal), 152 (D. Williams),
153 (Bick), 154 (Aguilera and Andreasen), 155 (Mehta)). These eight motions consist
of substantial briefing and exhibits for the ten defendants in this case.

1

2. The current deadlines are as follows: the Plaintiff’s Oppositions to the Defendants’

2

Motions for Summary Judgment are due by November 22, 2013; the Defendants’

3

Replies to Plaintiff’s Oppositions are due by November 29, 2013; the hearing for the

4

motions is scheduled for December 6, 2013.

5

3. Plaintiff is represented by certified law students from the U.C. Davis Civil Rights

6

Clinic. This extension will enable the law student’s full participation in briefing the

7

Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. The students’

8

fall semester ends on December 5, 2013 and their law school examination period ends

9

on December 23, 2013. Their spring semester will commence on January 9, 2013.

10

Thus, with the extension, the students would have approximately six weeks to prepare

11

their opposition and the Defendants would have three weeks to prepare their replies.

12

4. There is currently no date set for trial in this case. Thus, any rescheduling of the

13

responses and replies to Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment will not disrupt

14

any other deadlines or hearings in this case.

15

5. The parties have not previously sought an extension for Motions for Summary
Judgment.

16
17
18
19

For these reasons, the parties ask the Court to extend the deadline for filing the responses
and replies regarding Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment and the hearing date for the
motions.

20

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: November 7, 2013

Respectfully submitted,
/S/ Carter C. White
_____________________________
Carter C. White
Attorney for Plaintiff, Charles C. James

1
2

/S/ Kathleen J. Williams
Dated: November 7, 2013

3
4

Attorney for Defendants,
Aguilera, Andreasen, Bick, Dhillon,
Mehta, Pai, Williams, M.D.
and Williams N.P.

5
6
7
8

_____________________________
Kathleen J. Williams
Williams & Associates

Dated: November 7, 2013

/S/ Mitchell A. Wrosch

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

_____________________________
Mitchell A. Wrosch
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP
Attorney for Defendants,
C. Capitano, D.O. and R.K. Uppal

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

ORDER
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the summary judgment briefing
schedule is modified as follows:
Plaintiff’s Oppositions to Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment shall be filed and
served no later than Friday, January 24, 2014.
The Defendants’ Replies to Plaintiff’s Oppositions to Motions for Summary Judgment
shall be filed and served no later than Friday, February 14, 2014.
The hearing now set for December 6, 2013, is continued to Friday, February 28, 2014, at
10:00 a.m.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 7, 2013

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

/jame1171.msjstip