James v. Mehta
Filing
173
STIPULATION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/7/14. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CHARLES CORNELIUS JAMES,
12
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:10-cv-01171-LKK-DAD
13
v.
STIPULATION FOR A
PROTECTIVE ORDER
14
DEEPAK MEHTA, ET AL.,
Magistrate Judge:
15
Hon. Dale A. Drozd
Defendant.
16
WHEREAS, on December 20, 2013, the Court set a status conference for
17
18
January 10, 2014, to determine if Dr. Uppal is capable of suit or representation
19
(Doc. # 170);
WHEREAS, on January 5, 2014, Defendant Uppal’s counsel obtained recent
20
21
medical records pertaining to Dr. Uppal;
WHEREAS, on January 6, 2014, Defendants Uppal’s counsel offered to
22
23
provide the medical records to Plaintiff’s counsel, but due to privacy and HIPAA
24
concerns, cannot do so in the absence of a protective order;1
1.
25
The parties designate the medical records from North Bay Health Care,
26
dated January 1, 2014, and St. Helena Hospital, dated January 2, 4, and 5, 2014,
27
(“Dr. Uppal’s Medical Records”) as highly confidential and/or proprietary nature as
28
1
The medical records have been submitted to the Court for in camera review.
1
1
“CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” (hereinafter “Attorneys’ Eyes
2
Only Material”). Attorneys’ Eyes Only Material, and the information contained
3
therein, shall be disclosed only to the Court, and to counsel for the parties
4
(including the student attorneys, paralegal, clerical, and secretarial staff employed
5
by counsel), but shall not be disclosed to a party, unless otherwise agreed or
6
ordered. If disclosure of Attorneys’ Eyes Only Material is made, all other
7
provisions in this Order with respect to confidentiality shall also apply.
8
9
2.
Confidential documents shall be so designated by stamping copies of
the document produced to a party with the legend “CONFIDENTIAL.” Stamping
10
the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” on the cover of any multipage document shall
11
designate all pages of the document as confidential, unless otherwise indicated by
12
the producing party.
13
3.
Material designated as confidential under this Order, the information
14
contained therein, and any summaries, copies, abstracts, or other documents derived
15
in whole or in part from material designated as confidential (hereinafter
16
“Confidential Material”) shall be used only for the purpose of prosecution, defense,
17
or settlement of this action, and for no other purpose.
18
4.
The Confidential Material produced pursuant to this Order may be
19
disclosed or made available only to the Court, or to counsel for a party (including
20
the student attorneys, paralegal, clerical, and secretarial staff employed by such
21
counsel).
22
5.
If Dr. Uppal’s Medical Records are included in any papers to be filed
23
in Court, such papers shall be labeled “Confidential—Subject to Court Order,” and
24
filed under seal.
25
6.
In the event that Dr. Uppal’s Medical Records are used in any court
26
proceeding in this action, they shall not lose their confidential status through such
27
use, and the party using the material shall take all reasonable steps to maintain its
28
confidentiality during such use.
2
1
7.
This Order shall be without prejudice to the right of the parties (i) to
2
bring before the Court at any time a question of whether any particular document or
3
information is confidential or whether its use should be restricted or (ii) to present a
4
motion to the Court under FRCP 26(c) for a separate protective order as to any
5
particular document or information, including restrictions differing from those as
6
specified herein. This Order shall not be deemed to prejudice the parties in any way
7
in any future application for modification of this Order.
8
9
8.
This Order is entered solely for the purpose of facilitating the
exchange of documents and information between the parties to this action without
10
involving the Court unnecessarily in the process. Nothing in this Order nor the
11
production of any information or document under the terms of this Order nor any
12
proceedings pursuant to this Order shall be deemed to have the effect of an
13
admission or a waiver by any party or of altering the confidentiality or
14
nonconfidentiality of any such document or information or altering any existing
15
obligation of any party or the absence of obligation.
16
9.
This Order shall survive the final termination of this action, to the
17
extent that Dr. Uppal’s Medical Records are not or do not become known to the
18
public, and the Court shall retain jurisdiction to resolve any dispute concerning the
19
use of information disclosed under this Order.
20
10.
Upon termination of this case, Plaintiff’s counsel and co-Defense
21
counsel shall return Dr. Uppal’s Medical Records designated as confidential and all
22
copies of same, other than papers on file with the Court, or shall certify the
23
destruction thereof.
24
11.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, counsel shall be permitted to retain a
25
copy of each document filed with the Court or served in this proceeding, including
26
correspondence with opposing counsel, which copies shall remain subject to the
27
terms of this Order.
28
SO STIPULATED:
3
1
2
Dated: January 6, 2014
U.C. Davis Civil Rights Clinic
3
By: /s/ Carter C. White
Carter C. White
Supervising Attorney
4
5
Attorney for Plaintiff
CHARLES C. JAMES
6
7
Dated: January 6, 2014
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP
8
By: /s/ Mitchell A. Wrosch
Susan E. Coleman
Kristina D. Gruenberg
Mitchell A. Wrosch
9
10
11
Attorneys for Defendant
C. CAPITANO AND R.K. UPPAL
12
13
Dated: January 6, 2014
Williams & Associates
14
By: _/s/ Kathleen J.Williams_________
Kathleen J. Williams
15
16
Attorneys for Defendants
AGUILERA, ANDREASEN, BICK,
DHILLON, MEHTA, PAI,
WILLIAMS, M.D. AND WILLIAMS,
N.P.
17
18
19
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 7, 2014
22
23
/jame1171.po(2)
24
25
26
27
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?