James v. Mehta
Filing
234
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/28/2014 ORDERING a settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Kellison to be arranged. The Independent Medical Examination is STAYED pending counsels' participation in the settlement conference. (cc: CMK) (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CHARLES CORNELIUS JAMES,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
Case No. 2:10-cv-01171-LKK-DAD
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
DEEPAK MEHTA, ET AL.,
15
Defendant.
16
17
WHEREAS, on January 13, 2014, the parties stipulated, and the Court
18
ordered, that Defendant Uppal undergo an Independent Medical Examination (Doc.
19
# 178);
20
21
WHEREAS, counsel for Defendant Uppal has worked diligently to arrange
the Independent Medical Examination;
22
23
WHEREAS, the Independent Medical Examination has been scheduled and
cancelled multiple times due to Defendant Uppal’s illness1;
24
WHEREAS, counsel for Defendant Uppal and counsel for Plaintiff are
25
engaged in informal settlement discussions;
26
/////
27
1
28
Dr. Uppal’s counsel can provide the Court with a status on her mental health issues, should the Court find it
informative; however, due to HIPAA concerns, this will need to be submitted under seal.
1
WHEREAS, counsel for Defendant Uppal and counsel for Plaintiff request to
2
participate in a settlement conference to determine if settlement of the claims
3
against Defendant Uppal is possible;
4
WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s counsel has contacted Magistrate Judge Craig
5
Kellison to preside over the conference, but no date has yet been issued for the
6
conference;
7
It is hereby stipulated, between Plaintiff C. James, by and through his
8
attorney of record, and Defendant R.K. Uppal, by and through her attorneys of
9
record, that the parties will participate in a settlement conference with Magistrate
10
Judge Kellison as soon as can be arranged.
11
The parties further stipulate that the Independent Medical Examination be
12
stayed pending counsels’ participation in the settlement conference. Should the
13
parties fail to reach a settlement at the conference; the parties will meet and confer
14
regarding how the case will proceed as to Defendant Uppal and will provide a plan
15
for same to this Court.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SO STIPULATED:
1
2
Dated: February 26, 2014
3
By: /s/ Carter C. White
Carter C. White
Supervising Attorney
4
5
Attorney for Plaintiff
CHARLES C. JAMES
6
7
U.C. Davis Civil Rights Clinic
(electronic signature authorized)
Dated: February 26, 2014
Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP
8
9
By: /s/ Mitchell A. Wrosch
Susan E. Coleman
Kristina D. Gruenberg
Mitchell A. Wrosch
10
11
Attorneys for Defendant
C. CAPITANO AND R.K. UPPAL
12
13
14
Dated: February 26, 2014
15
Williams & Associates
(electronic signature authorized)
By: /s/ Kathleen J. Williams
Kathleen J. Williams
16
17
Attorneys for Defendants
AGUILERA, ANDREASEN, BICK,
DHILLON, MEHTA, PAI,
WILLIAMS, M.D. AND WILLIAMS,
N.P.
18
19
20
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED:
Dated: February 28, 2014
23
24
25
26
27
28
/jame1171.scstip
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?