James v. Mehta

Filing 24

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/28/11 ORDERING that the Order of the Magistrate Judge filed 3/31/11 is AFFIRMED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 vs. DEPAK MEHTA, et al., Defendants. / On March 17, 2011, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed March 3, 2011, denying him appointment of counsel. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed March 3, 2011, is affirmed. DATED: March 28, 2011. ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHARLES CORNELIUS JAMES, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-1171 LKK DAD P