James v. Mehta

Filing 256

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/1/14: All claims against defendant ANDREASEN, except for the claim of deliberate indifference to plaintiff's medical needs, are dismissed with prejudice. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARLES CORNELIUS JAMES, No. 2:10-CV-01171-LKK-DAD 12 Plaintiff, 13 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE DISMISSAL OF ANDREASEN vs. 14 DEPAK MEHTA, et al., 15 Defendants 16 17 18 Plaintiff JAMES and defendant ANDREASEN by and through their attorneys of record, stipulate to the dismissal, with prejudice, of all claims against ANDREASEN, 19 except for the claim of deliberate indifference to medical needs, each side to bear its 20 21 22 own costs and attorneys fees. Dated: 7/29/14 U.C. DAVIS CIVIL RIGHTS CLINIC By:/s/ “Carter Capps White” (signed with permission) CARTER CAPPS WHITE, CSB 164149 Attorneys for plaintiff CHARLES CORNELIUS JAMES 23 24 25 26 ///// 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 1 Dated: 7/29/14 WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES 2 By:/s/ Kathleen J. Williams KATHLEEN J. WILLIAMS, CSB 127021 Attorneys for defendants AGUILERA, ANDREASEN, BICK, DHILLON, MEHTA, PAI and WILLIAMS, M.D. 3 4 5 6 7 The undersigned has reviewed the stipulation signed by the parties. Pursuant to 8 that stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims against defendant 9 ANDREASEN, except for the claim of deliberate indifference to plaintiff’s medical needs, 10 are dismissed with prejudice. 11 Dated: August 1, 2014 12 13 /jame1171.stip(2) 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?