James v. Mehta
Filing
256
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/1/14: All claims against defendant ANDREASEN, except for the claim of deliberate indifference to plaintiff's medical needs, are dismissed with prejudice. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CHARLES CORNELIUS JAMES,
No. 2:10-CV-01171-LKK-DAD
12
Plaintiff,
13
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE
DISMISSAL OF ANDREASEN
vs.
14
DEPAK MEHTA, et al.,
15
Defendants
16
17
18
Plaintiff JAMES and defendant ANDREASEN by and through their attorneys of
record, stipulate to the dismissal, with prejudice, of all claims against ANDREASEN,
19
except for the claim of deliberate indifference to medical needs, each side to bear its
20
21
22
own costs and attorneys fees.
Dated: 7/29/14
U.C. DAVIS CIVIL RIGHTS CLINIC
By:/s/ “Carter Capps White” (signed with permission)
CARTER CAPPS WHITE, CSB 164149
Attorneys for plaintiff
CHARLES CORNELIUS JAMES
23
24
25
26
/////
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
Dated: 7/29/14
WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES
2
By:/s/ Kathleen J. Williams
KATHLEEN J. WILLIAMS, CSB 127021
Attorneys for defendants AGUILERA,
ANDREASEN, BICK, DHILLON,
MEHTA, PAI and WILLIAMS, M.D.
3
4
5
6
7
The undersigned has reviewed the stipulation signed by the parties. Pursuant to
8
that stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims against defendant
9
ANDREASEN, except for the claim of deliberate indifference to plaintiff’s medical needs,
10
are dismissed with prejudice.
11
Dated: August 1, 2014
12
13
/jame1171.stip(2)
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?