Baker v. Solano County Jail et al

Filing 68

ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 6/29/11 ORDERING that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed May 31, 2011, is AFFIRMED. (Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

JERRY W. BAKER,
Plaintiff,

11
12

vs.

13

No. 2:10-cv-1208 FCD KJN P

C/O SMITH, et al.,

14

Defendants.
/

15
16

ORDER

On June 9, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the magistrate

17

judge’s order filed May 31, 2011, denying plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery as the

18

discovery requests were untimely propounded. On June 10, 2011, defendants filed an opposition

19

to plaintiff’s motion. On June 20, 2011, plaintiff filed a reply. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule

20

303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.”

21

Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s

22

ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

23

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of

24

the magistrate judge filed May 31, 2011, is affirmed.

25

DATED: June 29, 2011.

26
1

_______________________________________
FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE