Torrence v. Hseuh et al

Filing 62

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/28/2011 GRANTING 61 Motion to Conduct Plaintiffs Deposition via Videoconference. Any penal institution need not obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available. (Michel, G)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES
1250 Sutterville Road, Suite 290
Sacramento, CA 95822
[phone]
[phone] (fax)
Kathleen J. Williams, CSB #127021
Martha M. Stringer, CSB #156333
Christina Carroll, CSB #263713
Attorneys for defendants
SAUKHLA, ANDREASEN, McKENZIE,
GRANNIS, WALKER, HAILE and BICK
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
10

DEAVON E. TORRENCE,
Plaintiff,

11
v.
12
F. HSEUH, et al.,

Defendants.

13
14
15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO: 2:10-cv-01222 KJN
ORDER

Defendants SAUKHLA, ANDREASEN, McKENZIE, GRANNIS, WALKER, HAILE

16

and BICK seek an order from the Court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

17

30(b)(4), to permit defendants’ counsel to conduct the deposition of plaintiff

18

DEAVON E. TORRENCE (K-65602) via videoconference.

19

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

20

1.

(dkt. no. 61) is GRANTED.

21
22

Defendants’ request to conduct plaintiff’s deposition via videoconference

2.

Nothing in this Order shall be interpreted as requiring any penal institution

23

to obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available.

24

Dated: September 28, 2011

25
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28

torr1222.vcd