Torrence v. Hseuh et al
Filing
69
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/13/11 DISREGARDING 68 Response. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
DEAVON E. TORRENCE,
Plaintiff,
11
12
vs.
13
No. 2:10-cv-1222 KJN P
F. HSEUH, et al.,
Defendants.
14
ORDER
/
15
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action
16
17
for relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 2, 2011, plaintiff filed a response to
18
defendant Hseuh’s answer. However, as plaintiff was informed by this court’s March 20, 2011
19
order, Rule 7 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure does not provide for a reply or response to a
20
defendant’s answer unless ordered by the court. (Dkt. No. 34.) The court did not order plaintiff
21
to file a response to defendant Hseuh’s answer; therefore, the response is disregarded.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s December 2, 2011
22
23
response (dkt. no. 68) is disregarded.
24
DATED: December 13, 2011
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
25
26
torr1222.77e2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?