Torrence v. Hseuh et al
Filing
72
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/30/2011 ADOPTING 60 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full; granting 52 Motion to Dismiss; defendant Champion is DISMISSED from this action. (Waggoner, D)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
DEAVON E. TORRENCE,
Plaintiff,
10
11
vs.
12
No. CIV. S-10-1222 KJM KJN P
F. HSEUH, et al.,
13
14
15
Defendants.
ORDER
/
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
16
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
17
Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
18
On September 9, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations,
19
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
20
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither party has
21
filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
22
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United
23
States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are
24
reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.
25
1983). Having carefully reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to
26
be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed September 9, 2011, are adopted in
3
full;
4
5
2. Defendant Champion’s July 25, 2011 motion to dismiss (ECF 52) is granted;
and
6
7
3. Defendant Champion is dismissed from this action.
DATED: December 30, 2011.
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
/torr1222.801
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?