Torrence v. Hseuh et al

Filing 99

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/29/13 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court is directed to annotate the court docket to reflect theconsent of all parties; The findings and recommendations filed January 28, 2013 (dkt. no. 96 ), are ADOPTED in full; Defendants June 22, 2012 motion for summary judgment (dkt. no. 80 ) is GRANTED; and this action is dismissed. CASE CLOSED.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEAVON E. TORRENCE, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 No. 2:10-cv-1222 KJN P F. HSUEH, e al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. On May 27, 2010, 17 plaintiff consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 18 On April 17, 2013, defendants consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). In light of the consent of all parties, the Clerk of the Court is directed to 20 annotate the court docket accordingly. 21 On January 28, 2013, the undersigned recommended that defendants’ motion for 22 summary judgment be granted. (Dkt. No. 96.) The findings and recommendations contained 23 notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed 24 within fourteen days. No party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 25 //// 26 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to annotate the court docket to reflect the 3 consent of all parties; 4 5 2. The findings and recommendations filed January 28, 2013 (dkt. no. 96), are adopted in full; 6 7 3. Defendants’ June 22, 2012 motion for summary judgment (dkt. no. 80) is granted; and 8 9 4. This action is dismissed. DATED: April 29, 2013 10 11 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 torr1222.jdg 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?