Edwards v. Taylor et al

Filing 46

RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 11/13/2012 45 RELATING CASE(S) 2:10-CV-1250 WBS KJN and 2:12-CV-2531 KJM EFB REASSIGNING CASE 2:12-CV-2531 to Judge William B. Shubb and Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman for all further proceedings. Any dates currently set in the reassigned case ONLY are hereby VACATED. Judge Kimberly J. Mueller, Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan no longer assigned to case. New Case Number: 2:12-CV-2531 WBS KJN. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 SHAUNTAE EDWARDS, 14 15 16 17 NO. 2:10-CV-1250 WBS KJN Plaintiff, 13 v. NIKE RETAIL SERVICES, INC.; RYAN TAYLOR; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants. _________________________________/ 18 19 SHAUNTAE EDWARDS, 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NO. 2:12-CV-2531 KJM EFB Plaintiff, 20 v. NIKE RETAIL SERVICES, INC.; DANNY GALLI; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants. _________________________________/ ----oo0oo---Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that these actions are related within the meaning of Local Rule 1 123(a) because the actions involve the same plaintiff and 2 similar defendants, the plaintiff is represented by the same 3 counsel in both actions, and both actions assert claims arising 4 out of the same time period during plaintiff’s employment with 5 defendant Nike Retail Services, Inc. 6 assignment of the matters to the same judge is likely to effect 7 a substantial saving of judicial effort and is also likely to be 8 convenient for the parties. Accordingly, the The parties should be aware that relating the cases 9 10 under Local Rule 123 merely has the result that both actions are 11 assigned to the same judge; no consolidation of the actions is 12 effected. 13 cases are generally assigned to the judge to whom the first 14 filed action was assigned. Under the regular practice of this court, related IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the actions denominated 15 16 Edwards v. Nike Retail Services, Inc., Civ. No. 2:10-1250 WBS 17 KJN, and Edwards v. Nike Retail Services, Inc., Civ. No. 18 2:12-2531 KJM EFB, be, and the same hereby are, deemed related 19 and the case denominated Edwards v. Nike Retail Services, Inc., 20 Civ. No. 2:12-2531 KJM EFB, shall be reassigned to the Honorable 21 WILLIAM B. SHUBB and Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. 22 dates currently set in the reassigned case only are hereby 23 VACATED. 24 reassigned case shall be shown as Edwards v. Nike Retail 25 Services, Inc., Civ. No. 2:12-2531 WBS KJN. 26 Any Henceforth, the caption on documents filed in the IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court 27 make appropriated adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to 28 compensate for this reassignment. 2 1 DATED: November 13, 2012 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?