Gallardo v. Cate, et al

Filing 16

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/5/2011 ORDERING that pltf's second amended cmplt is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim; and this case is CLOSED. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANK GALLARDO, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 No. CIV S-10-1263 KJN (TEMP) P M. CATE, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 ORDER / Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. On May 28, 2010 17 plaintiff filed a consent to proceed before the undersigned. By order filed March 29, 2011, 18 plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be 19 granted. Plaintiff was instructed how to cure the deficiencies in his pleadings and given thirty 20 days within which to file a second amended complaint. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file a 21 second amended complaint which complies with all of the terms of the March 29, 2011 order 22 would result in dismissal. 23 On April 29, 2011, plaintiff file a document titled “second amended complaint.” 24 However, there is no material difference between the content of the “second amended complaint” 25 and plaintiff’s amended complaint. In light of this, and because giving plaintiff leave to file a 26 third amended complaint appears futile, plaintiff’s second amended complaint will be dismissed 1 1 for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and this case will be closed. 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. Plaintiff’s second amended complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim 4 upon which relief can be granted; and 5 2. This case is closed. 6 DATED: May 5, 2011 7 8 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 gall1263.dis 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?