McCain v. Bank of America, NA, et al.
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/13/10 ORDERING the 8/25/10 hearing on 24 , 28 MOTIONS to DISMISS is VACATED. Motions Hearing RESET for 10/6/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (KJM) before Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Plaintiff shall file opposition, if any, to the motions no later than 9/22/10. (Donati, J)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. BANK OF AMERICA, NA, et al., Defendants. / This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). Calendared for hearing on August 25, 2010 are defendants' motions to dismiss. Although opposition to defendant Bank of America's motion was filed was this matter was pending in the District of Columbia, no opposition to the motion to dismiss noticed by defendant Sheriff San Joaquin County has been filed. Local Rule 78-230(c) provides that opposition to the granting of a motion must be filed fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Rule further provides that "[n]o party will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if written opposition to the motion has not been timely filed by that party." In addition, Local Rule 78-230(i) provides that failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of opposition to the motion or may result in sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 11-110 provides that failure to comply with the Local 1 ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TERRYLYN McCAIN, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-10-1266 JAM KJM PS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Rules "may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court." Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The hearing date of August 25, 2010 is vacated. Hearing on defendants' motions is continued to October 6, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 26. 2. Plaintiff shall file opposition, if any, to the motions no later than September 22, 2010 . Failure to file opposition and appear at the hearing will be deemed as a statement of non-opposition and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). DATED: August 13, 2010.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?