Bennett v. Biotronik, Inc. et al

Filing 62

ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/29/14: The Complaint and Amended Complaints in this action are dismissed without prejudice. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 CLAIRE M. SYLVIA (State Bar No. 138990) cms@pcsf.com 2 PHILLIPS & COHEN LLP 100 The Embarcadero, Suite 300 3 San Francisco, California 94105 Tel: (415) 836-9000 4 Fax: (415) 836-9001 5 PETER CHATFIELD peter@phillipsandcohen.com 6 PHILLIPS & COHEN LLP 2000 Massachusetts Avenue 7 Washington, DC 20036 Tel: (202) 833-4567 8 Fax: (202) 833-1815 9 L. TIMOTHY TERRY, admitted pro hac vice tim@theterrylawfirm.com 10 THE TERRY LAW FIRM LTD. P.O. Box 2348 11 Carson City, NV 89702 Tel: (775) 883-2348 12 Fax: (775) 883-2347 13 Attorneys for Qui Tam Plaintiff/Relator Max Bennett 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; THE STATES 2:10-CV-01273-KJM-EFB 16 OF CALIFORNIA, COLORADO, CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, FLORIDA, ORDER 17 GEORGIA, HAWAII, ILLINOIS, INDIANA, LOUISIANA, MICHIGAN, MASSACHUSETTS, 18 MONTANA, NEVADA, NEW HAMPSHIRE, NEW JERSEY, NEW MEXICO, NEW YORK, 19 NORTH CAROLINA, OKLAHOMA, RHODE ISLAND, TENNESSEE, TEXAS, VIRGINIA, 20 WISCONSIN, THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, AND DOE STATES 1-23, ex rel. MAX 21 BENNETT, 22 Plaintiffs, vs. BIOTRONIK, INC., WESTERN MEDICAL, 24 INC., CAESAR FONTE, AND PETER ELIA, ROBERT N. BERKELEY, LEON FELDMAN, 25 W. JUDSON FISHER, ARJUN V. GURURAJ, MONTY C. MORALES, WILLIAM H. RESH, 26 ROBERT C. WESLEY, AND NEVADA HEART AND VASCULAR CENTER, LLP, 27 Defendants. 28 23 1 2 ORDER UPON CONSIDERATION of qui tam Plaintiff-Relator Max Bennett’s “Notice of 3 Voluntary Dismissal” and the files and records in this case, it is hereby ORDERED that: 4 The Complaint and Amended Complaints in this action are dismissed without prejudice. 5 6 DATED: May 29, 2014. 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?