Thomas v. Nangalama et al

Filing 63

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/26/13 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 3/26/13 60 are ADOPTED in full; The 7/27/12 MOTION for Summary Judgment 50 is GRANTED in part, as to Plaintiff's claims that defendants unreasonably delayed a consultation with an outside urologist for his prostatitis in 2009, and is otherwise DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

DE’WAYNE GERMAN THOMAS,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13

No. 2:10-cv-1295 JAM EFB P

vs.
DR. ANDREW NANGALAMA, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15

ORDER
/

16

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

17

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

18

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

19

On March 26, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

20

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

21

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither

22

party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

23

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

24

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

25

ORDERED that:

26

/////
1

1
2

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 26, 2013, are adopted in full;
and

3

2. The July 27, 2012 motion for summary judgment (Dckt. No. 50) is granted in

4

part, as to plaintiff’s claims that defendants unreasonably delayed a consultation with an outside

5

urologist for his prostatitis in 2009, and is otherwise denied.

6

DATED: April 26, 2013

7
8

/s/ John A. Mendez
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2