Labkov v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Filing 8

ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 7/16/10: HEARING as to 5 Motion to Remand RESET for 8/19/2010 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Judge Morrison C. England Jr.. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Ropers Majeski Kohn & Bentley 9 10 A Professional Corporation San Francisco GEORGE G. WEICKHARDT (SBN 58586) WENDY C. KROG (SBN 257010) ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY 201 Spear Street, Suite 1000 San Francisco, CA 94105-1667 Telephone: (415) 543-4800 Facsimile: (415) 972-6301 Email: gweickhardt@rmkb.com wkrog@rmkb.com Attorneys for Defendant JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., erroneously sued herein as JPMORGAN CHASE BANK dba CHASE AUTO FINANCE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RC1/5633698.1/AB7 ALEKSEY LABKOV, an individual, Plaintiff, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, a New York Corporation dba CHASE AUTO FINANCE; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants. CASE NO. 10-CV-01315-MCE-EFB ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION TO REMAND Original Date: August 5, 2010 New Date: August 19, 2010 Time: 2:00 p.m. Judge: The Hon. Morrison C. England The parties having stipulated and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that the hearing on plaintiff's motion to remand is reset for August 19, 2010 at 2:00 p.m. and the dates for filing opposition and reply are extended by one week. While the Court recognizes that the parties' stipulation requests that the rehearing be rescheduled from August 5, 2010 to August 12, 2010, August 12th is not an available date for civil motions. Dated: July 16, 2010 __________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -1[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION TO REMAND PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?