Bodge v. Trinity County Sheriff's Department et al

Filing 13

ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/29/11 ORDERING that The 9 findings and recommendations filed January 27, 2011, are adopted in full. All defendants, except defendant Grossman, are dismissed with prejudice. This action proceeds against defendant Grossman only on plaintiff's claim that he obtained and executed a search warrant that was not based on probable cause. (Duong, D)

Download PDF
-CMK (PS) Bodge v. Trinity County Sheriff's Department et al Doc. 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Defendants. 16 / 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action alleging violations of her civil rights. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. On January 27, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis. /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DEBORAH LENORE BODGE, Plaintiff, v. TRINITY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, et al., No. 2:10-cv-01319-MCE-CMK ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. 2. 3. The findings and recommendations filed January 27, 2011, are adopted in full; All defendants, except defendant Grossman, are dismissed with prejudice; and This action proceeds against defendant Grossman only on plaintiff's claim that he obtained and executed a search warrant that was not based on probable cause. Dated: March 29, 2011 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?